All posts tagged Exchange

Last month, Google announced the integration of Google Voice into Gmail. Gmail users can now make calls right from within their email.

Google Voice in Gmail

Many analysts are citing this as a direct attack on Skype- but I think they’re wrong- I think it’s a direct attack on Microsoft, Telcos and PBX manufacturers. Skype has had similar functionality for a number of years, but it’s business adoption isn’t large enough for this to be an attack IMHO. Yes you can now call from your PC, but phones have long been the bane of businesses- especially smaller ones. They’re expensive and never function as you would really like them to. And although this is currently on Gmail only and not available today for businesses on Apps- it’s coming soon.

To PBX manufacturers and Telcos this represents a serious threat- why would you kit out your company with phone lines and extensions when you can have this for free on your PC? Or if you’re not at your PC, have your calls follow you on your mobile phone. That’s a serious amount of cost reduction- especially when you add in free in country calls and low cost foreign calls, and an improvement in functionality.

When it becomes available on Apps to businesses, it’s going to make a very compelling ROI case to use Apps.

Microsoft has had similar functionality available in Office Communication Server (OCS), but it’s been a separately installed and licensed application. To respond- I think Microsoft needs to put a more compelling value proposition around OCS- should they bundle it free with Exchange and BPOS? What about bundling free calls?

This is classic disruptive innovation- create a product that’s good enough for a small segment of the market and grow that into the mainstream. Google will soon be putting within reach of businesses a very powerful unified communications tool- and Microsoft needs to respond.

Add your comment (0)

Cloud Strategist
Mimecast

Article Tags

, , ,

There is a lot of talk about the performance improvements in Exchange 2010- in particular the reduction in Disk I/O.

Is this real or imagined? What are the tradeoffs Microsoft has had to make in order to make this work?

Join Exchange Expert and Mimecaster Barry Gill talk through some of the issues when looking to design your Exchange 2010 environment to take advantage of the improved performance.

Transcript

Justin Pirie (JP): So we’re back with Barry Gill, welcome to the Mimecast video blog. So, I’ve been hearing a lot of talk about the performance improvements in Exchange 2010, can you talk me through some of those please?

Barry Gill (BG): Well certainly Justin, I think one of the most significant performance that Exchange 2010 has introduced to us is the 70 to 75 percent input output or I/O performance improvement.

JP: So that’s disks isn’t it.

BG: That’s disk, yeah. Now what Microsoft have done is something they’ve been trying to get rid of since essentially Exchange 2000, is they’ve gotten rid of Single Instance Storage, so no longer are read and write operations are being scattered across platters on a disk, they are now, all of these processes are happening sequentially. So sequentially means there’s a lot less distance for the heads to travel across the drives which means they’re able to get these massive performance improvements.

Continue Reading →

Add your comment (0)

Enterprise Consultant
Mimecast

Article Tags

, , ,

[UPDATE: As with all things in the technology world, things have moved on. Exchange 2010 virtualization opportunities have changed dramatically since the posting of this video.]

In this video post, Justin and I talk a little about Microsoft Exchange 2010 and Virtualization and how architects need to make sure that assumptions they make are not going to catch them out in the end…

Please comment- this is my first Video Blog and I welcome your feedback!

Transcript

Justin Pirie (JP): So welcome to the Mimecast Blog, I’m here today with Barry Gill one of my fellow bloggers.

And I’m here really to pose the question to Barry as an infrastructure guy, about virtualization, because a lot of the time I hear “well we’ll just virtualize it” as a solution to peoples problems when they’re thinking about sprawling infrastructure.

So, in particular with relation to Exchange, because that’s what we really care about on-premise (at Mimecast). How do you get over those issues when people are talking to you about their sprawling infrastructure?

Barry Gill (BG): Possibly one of the most critical things for anybody to think about these days is to really assess whether or not the software they’re looking at, so in this instance Exchange server 2010, whether or not it actually supports virtualization.

You can’t just go out there and say every server will go onto our virtual infrastructure. These days it just doesn’t quite work like that. You know, Exchange Server 2010 has some severe limitations, some would call them limitations, in the way it handles virtualization. For example it utilises the built in Windows clustering technology and as such cannot be put on top of additional virtual environments.

Continue Reading →

Add your comment (2)

Enterprise Consultant
Mimecast

Article Tags

, ,

An old topic, but one that is going to take many years to go away.

Just this morning I found myself helping a sysadmin who was in a flat spin trying to find old emails.
The messages he needed were all dated 2002-2003 and the only place he could even begin his search was in his predecessors tape archive.

After a trip to the basement to find an old tape drive that would support the tapes where the data was, a lengthy device cleaning session to make sure the drive didn’t just destroy the tape and a lot of holding thumbs he was set to go.

Opening up the tape store he immediately found that the “email backup 2002” tape he was looking at had full backup of the companies old Exchange 2000 server mail store.

“AARRRGGHHHH….”

This is when he started asking around for help and where I came into the picture.

I quickly explained that there really is no easy way to do this considering that he had already progressed long past Exchange 2000 and that we would have to restore the backup of the old mail store into a version of Exchange that supported it, i.e. Exchange 2000.

“OK, I’ll do that, build a Windows 2000 server and then install Exchange 2000 on it.
I’ll then restore from tape to it.

On another note, do you know where I could get a copy of Exchange 2000?
Is it still available on a Microsoft site?”

ROADBLOCK! Continue Reading →

Add your comment (0)

Enterprise Consultant
Mimecast

Article Tags

, ,

eDiscovery and general litigation readiness were the third major drivers to the Email Archiving industry.  The first two were Exchange/mailbox management and regulatory compliance for SEC/NASD compliance.

The archive held much promise because it proffered a way to minimize the pain that organizations were feeling around the preservation, collection and production of email.  If deployed and configured correctly, it would provide several benefits, most notable the ability to search ONE location for email. Continue Reading →

Add your comment (0)

We’re on the verge of a New Information Age. The old one has been around for thirty years or more, and it’s legacy is not all that wonderful. There’s been an explosion in the volume of data produced, sent and stored on servers, desktops and laptops around the world. Companies have tried to manage by keeping pace, adding servers, amassing file stores and updating PCs every few months.

Email, not surprisingly, has been at the heart of this digital big bang, with 97% of written business communication based on email, and some 84% of corporate IP being held in email systems. For IT Directors and managers of corporate email systems, then, the Information Age has resulted in a complex and costly IT infrastructure, accompanied by huge levels of risk, given the critical value of the information held in these systems.

Continue Reading →

Add your comment (1)